Skip to main content
plas-tech engineering - Supplier for COC/COP PFS Syringes
Schreiner
rochling

Login Menu

  • Login
  • Register
Home
  • HOME
  • CONNECTIONS
    • Suppliers
    • Buyers
    • Professionals
    • User Companies
    • Softwares
    • Others
  • INDUSTRY UPDATES
    • Packaging News
    • Innovations
    • Press Releases
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Newsletter
    • Testimonials
    • Packaging Interviews
    • Packaging 4 startups
  • BLOG
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • Big Book of Packaging
  • OUR PARTNERS
    • Bonini
    • Bernhardt
    • EMA
    • Haemotronic
    • Intin
    • Plas-Tech Engineering
    • Polycine
    • Rochling
    • Sanok Rubber
    • Schreiner
    • TARA
    • Yukon Medical
  • SERVICES
    • SUSTAINABLE EXHIBITION
    • CONSULTING
    • DESIGN SERVICES
    • NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Packaging material a key issue for the climate

Packaging material a key issue for the climate

Profile picture for user ch.bhaskar01
By Bhaskar Ch on Tue, 12/18/2018 - 09:59

Switching material from plastic to paperboard can reduce a packaging’s climate impact by 99 per cent. For people who influence the choice of packaging material, this single choice can make the biggest climate impact during a product manager or designer’s entire professional career. That’s the conclusion of a study done by IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute for Iggesund Paperboard.

 

The starting point was to study some of the commonest packaging types and compare the differences in climate impact depending on the choice of packaging material.

 

“There are tables giving carbon dioxide emissions per kilo of material, but when you compare real examples of packaging, you realise the great importance of the choice of material,” comments Johan Granås, Sustainability Director at Iggesund Paperboard.

 

“Plastic is a fantastic material for many applications and we use it ourselves when producing paperboard for food packaging that needs a thin plastic barrier to protect its contents,” he adds. “But we believe that decision makers in the packaging industry must know about the effects of their choice of material.”

 

Packaging light bulbs in plastic or paperboard respectively is the most extreme example in the survey. By switching from plastic to paperboard, it is possible to reduce the climate impact of the packaging by 99 per cent. In the example that was most favourable for plastic, a paperboard carton containing 500 grams of pasta was compared with the corresponding amount of pasta packed in a thin plastic bag. The conclusion was that the plastic bag has a 3.25 times larger climate impact than the paperboard carton. This is despite the fact that the bag only weighs one-sixth as much as the carton and has significantly worse protective and stacking properties.

 

“There are masses of packagings that cannot be made in anything other than plastic today,” Johan Granås emphasises. “But there are also packagings that are made of plastic where it is easy to switch material without losing function at all – and it is logical to start there if we want to reduce packaging’s climate impact.”

 

For the paperboard packagings used in the study, climate data for Iggesund’s paperboard Invercote was used. For the plastic materials, IVL drew on data from the databases used for doing lifecycle analyses. None of the paperboard packagings used in the study is made of material from Iggesund Paperboard.

 

“This is a study that shows the climate impact of different types of packaging. The mandate to IVL was to be general. Neither they nor we know the climate data for each individual packaging. However, based on the recognised environmental databases, this definitely indicates the great importance of the choice of material,” Granås concludes.

 

IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute was jointly founded in 1966 by the Swedish government and industry to do research into industry’s air and water management issues. Today IVL is an environmental institute that focuses on the interplay between environmental, economic and social perspectives.

  • Log in or register to post comments
plas-tech engineering - Supplier for COC/COP PFS Syringes
YUKON MEDICAL
TARA NIRMAN
schreiner
rochling
2 months ago
Recycling Program Turns Label Waste Into New Packaging
2 months ago
The High-Tech Secrets Behind the Humble Tin Can: A Modern Marvel of Steel Innovation
2 months ago
Recyclability Emerges as Top Priority for European Consumers, Amcor Study Finds

Follow Us

  • linkedin
  • facebook-f
  • twitter

Explore

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Login
  • Register
  • Add Testimonial

Company

  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Packaging News
  • Terms & Conditions
Top 7 Packaging Must-Haves for Personal Care Products
Top 7 Packaging Must-Haves for Personal Care Products
03 May, 2025
FDA
Navigating New FDA Packaging Regulations in 2025: A Complete Guide
29 Apr, 2025
Lamination
Unveiling the Future of Lamination Films: Trends, Challenges & How Purchasers Can Stay Ahead!
26 Apr, 2025

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact
Home
  • HOME
  • CONNECTIONS
    • Suppliers
    • Buyers
    • Professionals
    • User Companies
    • Softwares
    • Others
  • INDUSTRY UPDATES
    • Packaging News
    • Innovations
    • Press Releases
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Newsletter
    • Testimonials
    • Packaging Interviews
    • Packaging 4 startups
  • BLOG
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • Big Book of Packaging
  • OUR PARTNERS
    • Bonini
    • Bernhardt
    • EMA
    • Haemotronic
    • Intin
    • Plas-Tech Engineering
    • Polycine
    • Rochling
    • Sanok Rubber
    • Schreiner
    • TARA
    • Yukon Medical
  • SERVICES
    • SUSTAINABLE EXHIBITION
    • CONSULTING
    • DESIGN SERVICES
    • NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION
Clear keys input element