Skip to main content
plas-tech engineering - Supplier for COC/COP PFS Syringes
Schreiner
rochling

Login Menu

  • Login
  • Register
Home
  • HOME
  • CONNECTIONS
    • Suppliers
    • Buyers
    • Professionals
    • User Companies
    • Softwares
    • Others
  • INDUSTRY UPDATES
    • Packaging News
    • Innovations
    • Press Releases
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Newsletter
    • Testimonials
    • Packaging Interviews
    • Packaging 4 startups
  • BLOG
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • Big Book of Packaging
  • OUR PARTNERS
    • Bonini
    • Bernhardt
    • EMA
    • Haemotronic
    • Intin
    • Plas-Tech Engineering
    • Polycine
    • Rochling
    • Sanok Rubber
    • Schreiner
    • TARA
    • Yukon Medical
  • SERVICES
    • SUSTAINABLE EXHIBITION
    • CONSULTING
    • DESIGN SERVICES
    • NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Ban on PET Packaging for Pharmaceuticals - Are we prepared?

Ban on PET Packaging for Pharmaceuticals - Are we prepared?

Profile picture for user chhavi.aggarwal01
By Chhavi Aggarwal on Wed, 10/07/2015 - 11:19

Ban on PET2 The discussions started during early 2013 when Him Jagriti, an Uttarakhand-based non-governmental organization (NGO) that works in the health sector, approached the ministry of health seeking a ban on the use of PET for pharmaceutical packaging. The government entrusted the Drugs Technical Advisory Board (DTAB), which is the highest decision-making body under the ministry on technical matters, to take a call. In one of the meetings, DTAB discussed a test conducted by the All India Institute of Hygiene and Public Health (AIIHPH), which is affiliated to the health ministry. The tests revealed that the levels of toxic chemicals were higher than safety limits. The DTAB minutes state that antimony, chromium, lead and diethylhexyl phthalate were present at room temperature in all five samples evaluated for pharma preparations packaged in PET bottles. In November 2013, DTAB recommended a phasing out of PET bottles for pharma packaging over a period of six months. In the first phase, it suggested there should be a ban on the use of PET to package liquid oral formulations for paediatric and geriatric use, as well as for drugs used by pregnant women However, following strong resistance from PET manufacturers, a draft notification by the ministry of health prohibiting the use of PET for packaging was put on hold in September 2014 As per Suresh Singhal, general secretary of the PET Container Manufacturers Association, there is sufficient data to counter the claim that toxic substances were seen in medicine packaging at room temperature. There are test results available from Shriram Institute that concluded PET is completely safe Pranay Kumar, Chief Environment Officer, Vasudhaecofriends Projects feels that the industry is not prepared at all to follow the rule. He opines, “Pharma professionals would be well advised to go for elaborate testing for leachables / extractables at various temperatures and chemicals with glass and PET. Plastics have made many revolutions possible, including milk and oil and play a very large role in saving food wastage in a country like ours. Ban on PET3Alternative to PET could be glass but then it has its own challenges like logistics and cost. So what could be a safe way forward on this regulation?    

Packaging is a crucial part of the drug manufacturing and marketing process. While the latest move is likely to have a huge dent on revenues of bottle manufacturers who supply to pharmaceutical companies, it may also have an impact on drug makers as packaging cost and margins on it are determined by the pricing regulator.

Ban on PET1The thought revolves around the impact of this ban - If it does take effect, is our pharma industry prepared to take the blow? Can Cough syrups, antacids or vitamins in plastic and PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) bottles become a thing of past?   What are your opinions on this? Here is the link to a quick survey where you can share your opinions - https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ban-on-PET

  • Log in or register to post comments

Comments

Damage without preparation already done to the Human being including environment. If you have to see the cost, One should not waste money on medicines. Logistics is a matter of thought & convince only.
Thu, 10/08/2015 - 15:50
Pushpak Agarwal (not verified)
  • Log in or register to post comments

I strongly suspect that the "study" is flawed. PET in various grades has been evaluated, validated and used in the West for many years. If there are any serious concerns they would have been flagged up long before now by those with greater experience, especially in markets where serious litigation is common. Surely India has more serious production, validation and compliance issues to be concerned with?
Thu, 10/08/2015 - 20:10
Gordon Millar (not verified)
  • Log in or register to post comments

Right! PET is being used for feeding bottles, what else do we need to validate on purity?
Profile picture for user chhavi221201
Tue, 10/13/2015 - 14:47
chhavi221201

In reply to by Gordon Millar (not verified)

  • Log in or register to post comments

Agreed with Gordon Miller.... and sure the validation and compliance issues will not get resolved due to high level of corruption in our countries i.e. India & Pakistan very sad to take my county name too :(
Profile picture for user hasan01
Fri, 10/09/2015 - 10:46
hasan01
  • Log in or register to post comments

PET is the future of packaging. The reason being it can be manufactured from Agricultural waste. So there is a strong lobby against pet world wide from surprisingly the petrochemical industry. If pet is banned it will be unfortunate.
Fri, 10/09/2015 - 14:41
d b shetty (not verified)
  • Log in or register to post comments

Ofcourse. And when we say Glass can substitute PET, this is actually not true. Glass has its own challenges which cannot be ignored
Profile picture for user chhavi221201
Tue, 10/13/2015 - 14:46
chhavi221201

In reply to by d b shetty (not verified)

  • Log in or register to post comments

The understanding of testing and transparency in system between Industry and Government is also a concern, the systems are made so complicated that half do not completely understand and the other half manipulate. This seems to be another "Maggi"
Mon, 10/12/2015 - 15:24
amita venkatesh (not verified)
  • Log in or register to post comments

Exactly. This seems to be the same situation. Just keep banning products / packaging without actually going through the actual reasons
Profile picture for user chhavi221201
Tue, 10/13/2015 - 14:45
chhavi221201

In reply to by amita venkatesh (not verified)

  • Log in or register to post comments

It's just that actual test results for products packed vs unpacked needs to analysed before coming to direct conclusions and go ahead banning the product (PET)
Profile picture for user chhavi221201
Tue, 10/13/2015 - 14:48
chhavi221201
  • Log in or register to post comments

The Pharma Bottles made from PET (Polyester) recycled or used bottles in India should be banned. Only the ones made from Virgin grades should only be used. If recycled PET is used then 5 % max should be mixed with virgin materials and only in case they have used the proper equipment. In India recycling is done on very cheap plants from China which are unable to remove contaminations such as PVC, Glue, sugar etc. and also degrade the material making it not suitable for food or pharma application. Such recyclers should be banned from supplying recycled PET for Bottle applications. Unregulated Pharma companies mostly use 100% recycled materials and because of them all have to suffer. 95% of the soft drinks use only Virgin PET for bottles and at times add a max of 2.5 PET recycled material from regulated plants. Never has there been any issue of contamination. The government should allow use of all recycled bottles only for non food application. World over more and more PET bottles are used for Pharma formulations as it is safe.
Fri, 10/23/2015 - 15:00
Hrudayesh (not verified)
  • Log in or register to post comments

Thanks Hrudayesh for sharing your views.
Profile picture for user chhavi221201
Wed, 11/04/2015 - 08:36
chhavi221201

In reply to by Hrudayesh (not verified)

  • Log in or register to post comments
plas-tech engineering - Supplier for COC/COP PFS Syringes
YUKON MEDICAL
TARA NIRMAN
schreiner
rochling
2 months ago
Recycling Program Turns Label Waste Into New Packaging
2 months ago
The High-Tech Secrets Behind the Humble Tin Can: A Modern Marvel of Steel Innovation
2 months ago
Recyclability Emerges as Top Priority for European Consumers, Amcor Study Finds

Follow Us

  • linkedin
  • facebook-f
  • twitter

Explore

  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • About us
  • Advertise With Us
  • Login
  • Register
  • Add Testimonial

Company

  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Packaging News
  • Terms & Conditions
Top 7 Packaging Must-Haves for Personal Care Products
Top 7 Packaging Must-Haves for Personal Care Products
03 May, 2025
FDA
Navigating New FDA Packaging Regulations in 2025: A Complete Guide
29 Apr, 2025
Lamination
Unveiling the Future of Lamination Films: Trends, Challenges & How Purchasers Can Stay Ahead!
26 Apr, 2025

Footer menu

  • Privacy
  • Terms and conditions
  • Contact
Home
  • HOME
  • CONNECTIONS
    • Suppliers
    • Buyers
    • Professionals
    • User Companies
    • Softwares
    • Others
  • INDUSTRY UPDATES
    • Packaging News
    • Innovations
    • Press Releases
    • Events
    • Resources
    • Newsletter
    • Testimonials
    • Packaging Interviews
    • Packaging 4 startups
  • BLOG
  • OUR PRODUCTS
    • Big Book of Packaging
  • OUR PARTNERS
    • Bonini
    • Bernhardt
    • EMA
    • Haemotronic
    • Intin
    • Plas-Tech Engineering
    • Polycine
    • Rochling
    • Sanok Rubber
    • Schreiner
    • TARA
    • Yukon Medical
  • SERVICES
    • SUSTAINABLE EXHIBITION
    • CONSULTING
    • DESIGN SERVICES
    • NEWSLETTER SUBSCRIPTION
Clear keys input element